Prime Daily Values are a term, which defines the actual nutrient values that are needed to consume daily with supplements to achieve and retain a state of superior health and cognitive ability.
Basically, to be Your Best Self! And to Flourish and Thrive!
Although I did create the term Prime Daily Values for easier reference, I did not develop the values themselves. These values have been developed by Dr. Mark Hyman and are published in the book “The UltraMind Solution“.
From what I gather, these values have been a major factor in helping tens of thousands of people to repair their health and achieve superior health and cognitive ability. (The other major factor being eating healthy.)
Here are the Prime Daily Values, which we are looking at when we’re evaluating vitamin supplements.
“Why does TheSupplementAlliance.com not use the reference values like DV (US), NRV (European Union, Australia) or any other, which typically are labelled on supplements?”
Well, we believe in superior health.
Yet these values, of which you typically see percentage values on supplement labels, are based on an outdated model. A model of deficiency.
The key questions within this old model to establish reference values, such as DV and NRV, are as follows:
- How much vitamin A is needed to avoid night blindness?
- How much vitamin B1 is needed to avoid beriberi?
- How much vitamin B2 is needed to avoid dermatitis or anemia?
- etc.                
So, how much do you need a particular vitamin, mineral or a trace element in order to not develop a disease? Well, typically not very much, which is also what we see, if we take a look at 100% values of DV, NRV or any other similar value. 
According to this model, as long as you don’t have any of the deficiency diseases, you are getting enough nutrients (vitamins, minerals, trace elements). But this is simply not true.
You are getting enough nutrients to avoid deficiencies, yes. But not enough to optimise all of your cellular functions (and get the full benefit). Or, in other words, to achieve the best health and cognitive ability possible.
In this picture above you can see a hypothetical example of the Magnesium functions in the body. Hypothetical, because there are over 600 functions Magnesium is associated with.  But here we have only four (so to say few of the big ones) in the picture.
Meaning there is enough of Magnesium to ensure that you do not get sick with Hyperexcitability. It probably ensures that you don’t get cramps too. It also prevents other deficiency induced effects.
But there is too little Magnesium to enhance your memory and ensure great learning ability. And you might think that you’re a slow learner or you have poor memory, which is not necessarily the case and all that it really might be, is not having enough Magnesium.
And this doesn’t stop there. Most of these 600 functions will not be carried out effectively or at all, because of the fact that your body simply does not have enough Magnesium.
Similarly, as with the Magnesium, also Vitamin D carries out quite a bit different functions in the body.  For the sake of example, we have 3 of them in the picture (we’ll keep sticking with the few of the big ones for simplicity).
Meaning, you may acquire enough Vitamin D to prevent rickets. But as all of it goes towards that goal, you might be hit by feeling constantly tired or getting sick (colds and bronchitis through the roof).   
Furthermore, nutrient deficiencies can also develop so called long-latency diseases. These diseases happen when for a long period of time (many, many years) there is not enough of a particular nutrient for optimal cellular function. But DV, NRV and other similar values does not ensure optimal cellular function.
For example, not having enough Folic Acid (being seriously deficient) in a pretty short time will develop amenia or birth defects for a baby. But in the long run having not enough of the nutrient for optimal cellular function has a significantly higher chance of developing Alzheimer’s disease.
Other long-latency diseases include schizophrenia, attention-deficit disorder, cancer, depression, heart disease, dementia and many other.
Thus, because all of this, consuming nutrients according to DV, NRV and other similar values over the long run won’t ensure that you don’t develop these huge diseases and conditions mentioned.
Why these Daily Values are so low, but Tolerable Upper Intake Levels are so high?
If the ideas discussed before did not convince you that DV, NRV and other similar values are not the way to go, consider this.
If you’ve ever come across the Tolerable Upper Intake Levels (UL for short) – have you ever thought about why these established DV, NRV and other similar values are so low, but the ULs are so high?
“What is an UL (Tolerable Upper Intake Level)?” you might ask.
Well, simply put, those are levels set to formulate the highest amount of a particular nutrient intake daily that poses no risk of adverse effects, when used for very, very, very long periods of time.  To put it in other words, if you do not exceed these levels formulated, there is no risk of aquiring a disease or an adverse condition of some kind.
Of course, risk wise ULs are referable to 98-99% of the population. We all are different. So it is possible that for 1-2% of the population these levels can be lower or even higher.
NRV and DV values for Vitamin E are 12 mg and 30 IU, respectively.
UL for European Union is 300 mg, therefore, the gap between the respective NRV and UL is 288 mg. UL for US on the other hand, is 1000 mg, therefore, there is a gap of at least 970 mg.
Take a minute and just really think about it!
288 mg gap, when no adverse effects of using Vitamin E are not present!! Or a 970 mg gap in US case, when there is no present adverse affects!! This is the gap between what is recommended for daily intake (100% values of DV, NRV and other similar values) and UL!
I mean, this gap is Huge!
Some may say: “Well, this can be easily explained, because most probably any excess Vitamin E can be easily excreted from the body. 300 mg or 1000 mg probably is just too much of the amount, which our bodies can no longer reliably excrete.”
Well, Vitamin E is a fat soluble Vitamin. And fat soluble Vitamins are not really known for their easy excretion from the body if consumed in excess amounts, water-soluble Vitamins are.  
So, where do these 300 mg (EU) or 1000 mg (US) go, if they do not pose a threat or adverse effects and are consumed in these amounts for decades?
The only reasonable explanation is – they are utilised by the body to carry out functions.
Furthermore, if we were to look at other Vitamins, Minerals and Trace Elements and their respective UL values, we would encounter similar gaps to those already discussed. They may not be so huge, but they are certainly there.
Therefore, this is compleately certain, unswering, unfaltering – DV, NRV and similar values are not the way to go! These values represent minimum daily requirements that each person needs in order to not get sick.
But in order to achieve and retain a state of superior health and cognitive ability one must consume nutrients in or close to amounts of PDV given above!
Stay healthy! Be happy! Thank you for taking your time to read this! I highly appreciate it! All comments are welcome! 🙂
References [ + ]
|1.||↑||Hyman M (Dr.). The Ultramind Solution. New York: Scribner, 2010, p. 119-121.|
|2.||↑||Guidance for Industry: A Food Labeling Guide (14. Appendix F: Calculate the Percent Daily Value for the Appropriate Nutrients). U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Jan., 2013. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|3.||↑||What Is the Difference Between DRI & Daily Value? SF Gate. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|4.||↑||Health Information. Daily Values. National Institues of Health. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|5.||↑||Health Information. Nutrient Recommendations: Dietary Reference Intakes (DRI). National Institues of Health. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|6.||↑||Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs): Estimated Average Requirements. National Academies. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|7.||↑||Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs): Recommended Dietary Allowances and Adequate Intakes, Vitamins and Elements. National Academies. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|8.||↑||Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs): Tolerable Upper Intake Levels, Vitamins and Elements. National Academies. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|9.||↑||Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium, Vitamin D, and Fluoride. Institute of Medicine (US) Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 1997.|
|10.||↑||DV vs DRI comparison. Vital Formulas. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|11.||↑||DRI Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. A Report of the Standing Committee on the Scientific Evaluation of Dietary Reference Intakes and its Panel on Folate, Other B Vitamins, and Choline and Subcommittee on Upper Reference Levels of Nutrients, Food and Nutrition Board, Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. 1998.|
|12.||↑||Dietary Reference Values and Dietary Guidelines. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|13.||↑||Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 Text with EEA relevance. European Union Law. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|14.||↑||Dietary Reference Values for Nutrients. Summary Report. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). 2017. Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|15.||↑||Is RDA the same as NRV? Just Vitamins. May 5, 2016. Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|16.||↑||Fredericks R. What are Nutritional Reference Values? Nov. 1, 2014. Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|17.||↑||Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand Including Recommended Dietary Intakes. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian Government. Sep. 22, 2017. Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|18.||↑||Guidance for Industry: A Food Labeling Guide (14. Appendix F: Calculate the Percent Daily Value for the Appropriate Nutrients). U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA). Jan., 2013. Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|19.||↑||Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004 Text with EEA relevance. European Union Law. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|20.||↑||Hyman M (Dr.). The Ultramind Solution. New York: Scribner, 2010, p. 119-121.|
|21.||↑||De Baaij JH, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ. Magnesium in man: implications for health and disease. Pubmed. Jan., 2015. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|22.||↑||Collins J. F. Molecular, Genetic, and Nutritional Aspects of Major and Trace Minerals. First Edition. London: Academic Press. 2016. p. 308|
|23.||↑||Vitamin D. Oregon State University. Linus Pauling Institute Micronutrient Information Center. [Last viewed on 26.10.2017.] The link leads to a website provided by the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University. Matiss and TheSupplementAlliance.com are not affiliated or endorsed by the Linus Pauling Institute or Oregon State University.|
|24.||↑||Spritzler F. 8 Signs and Symptoms of Vitamin D Deficiency. Healthline. July 13, 2016. [Last viewed on 26.10.2017.]|
|25.||↑||Holick MF. Vitamin D Deficiency. The New England Journal of Medicine. July 19, 2007. [Last viewed on 04.11.2017.]|
|26.||↑||Roy S, Sherman A, Monari-Sparks MJ, Schweiker O, Hunter K. Correction of Low Vitamin D Improves Fatigue: Effect of Correction of Low Vitamin D in Fatigue Study (EViDiF Study). Pubmed. Aug., 2014. [Last viewed on 04.11.2017.]|
|27.||↑||Jat KR. Vitamin D deficiency and lower respiratory tract infections in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Pubmed. May 12, 2016. [Last viewed on 04.11.2017.]|
|28.||↑||Charan J, Goyal JP, Saxena D, Yadav P. Vitamin D for prevention of respiratory tract infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pubmed. Oct., 2012. [Last viewed on 04.11.2017.]|
|29.||↑||Hyman M (Dr.) The Ultramind Solution. New York: Scribner, 2010, p. 119-120.|
|30.||↑||Seshadri S, Beiser A, Selhub J, Jacques PF, Rosenberg IH, D’Agostino RB, Wilson PW, Wolf PA. Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Pubmed. Feb., 2002. [Last viewed on 04.11.2017.]|
|31.||↑||Hyman M (Dr.) The Ultramind Solution. New York: Scribner, 2010, p. 119-120.|
|32.||↑||Tolerable Upper Intake Levels For Vitamins And Minerals. Scientific Committee on Food.|
Scientific Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). February, 2006. [Last viewed on 26.10.2017.]
|33.||↑||Dietary Reference Intakes: A Risk Assessment Model for Establishing Upper Intake Levels for Nutrients. Institute of Medicine (US) Food and Nutrition Board.|
Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 1998. [Last viewed on 26.10.2017.]
|34.||↑||Vitamin E. Fact Sheet for Health Professionals. National Institutes of Health. Nov. 3, 2016. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|35.||↑||Knudson J. Do All Excess Vitamins Get Excreted From the Body? Live Strong. Oct. 3, 2017. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|36.||↑||Know the Difference Between Fat- and Water-Soluble Nutrients. WebMD. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|
|37.||↑||White A (& Wilson DR). Fat-Soluble Vitamins. Healthline. June 22, 2017. [Last viewed on 03.11.2017.]|